HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are both processors known for their power and performance. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a powerful architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle multitasking and demanding applications with ease. It also supports the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. Additionally, the Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which contributes to its efficiency and power optimization. With 2000 million transistors, this processor offers impressive processing capabilities. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 5 Watts, indicating a low power consumption.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, it features an architecture that includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Just like the Kirin 950, it also has a total of 8 cores, enabling smooth multitasking and high-performance computing. The Instruction Set supported by the T740 5G is ARMv8.2-A, which brings enhancements in security and performance. With a 12 nm lithography process, this processor offers a good balance between power and efficiency. Another notable feature of the T740 5G is its Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which improves AI processing capabilities.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are powerful processors with their own advantages. The Kirin 950 stands out with its higher clock speeds and lower lithography, making it a great choice for high-performance tasks. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a more advanced neural processing unit, enhancing its AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a powerful architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle multitasking and demanding applications with ease. It also supports the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. Additionally, the Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which contributes to its efficiency and power optimization. With 2000 million transistors, this processor offers impressive processing capabilities. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 5 Watts, indicating a low power consumption.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, it features an architecture that includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Just like the Kirin 950, it also has a total of 8 cores, enabling smooth multitasking and high-performance computing. The Instruction Set supported by the T740 5G is ARMv8.2-A, which brings enhancements in security and performance. With a 12 nm lithography process, this processor offers a good balance between power and efficiency. Another notable feature of the T740 5G is its Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which improves AI processing capabilities.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are powerful processors with their own advantages. The Kirin 950 stands out with its higher clock speeds and lower lithography, making it a great choice for high-performance tasks. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a more advanced neural processing unit, enhancing its AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 11.2 | |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Helio G85
4
MediaTek Helio G95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
5
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
8
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
9
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000