HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are both processors known for their power and performance. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a powerful architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle multitasking and demanding applications with ease. It also supports the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. Additionally, the Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which contributes to its efficiency and power optimization. With 2000 million transistors, this processor offers impressive processing capabilities. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 5 Watts, indicating a low power consumption.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, it features an architecture that includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Just like the Kirin 950, it also has a total of 8 cores, enabling smooth multitasking and high-performance computing. The Instruction Set supported by the T740 5G is ARMv8.2-A, which brings enhancements in security and performance. With a 12 nm lithography process, this processor offers a good balance between power and efficiency. Another notable feature of the T740 5G is its Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which improves AI processing capabilities.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are powerful processors with their own advantages. The Kirin 950 stands out with its higher clock speeds and lower lithography, making it a great choice for high-performance tasks. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a more advanced neural processing unit, enhancing its AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a powerful architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle multitasking and demanding applications with ease. It also supports the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. Additionally, the Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which contributes to its efficiency and power optimization. With 2000 million transistors, this processor offers impressive processing capabilities. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 5 Watts, indicating a low power consumption.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, it features an architecture that includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Just like the Kirin 950, it also has a total of 8 cores, enabling smooth multitasking and high-performance computing. The Instruction Set supported by the T740 5G is ARMv8.2-A, which brings enhancements in security and performance. With a 12 nm lithography process, this processor offers a good balance between power and efficiency. Another notable feature of the T740 5G is its Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which improves AI processing capabilities.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are powerful processors with their own advantages. The Kirin 950 stands out with its higher clock speeds and lower lithography, making it a great choice for high-performance tasks. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a more advanced neural processing unit, enhancing its AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 11.2 | |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P35 vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
6
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Helio G35
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Helio G35
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Helio G70
10
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695