HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the HiSilicon Kirin 960 are both powerful processors with similar specifications. Both processors feature 8 cores with an ARMv8-A instruction set.
In terms of the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 950 has 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Kirin 960 has 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This indicates that the Kirin 960 has an upgraded and more powerful CPU architecture compared to the Kirin 950.
In terms of the lithography, both processors have a 16 nm lithography process, which means they are built using the same manufacturing technology. This suggests that there may not be a significant difference in power efficiency between the two.
However, one notable difference is the number of transistors. The Kirin 950 has 2000 million transistors, while the Kirin 960 has 4000 million transistors. This indicates that the Kirin 960 has a higher transistor count, which generally implies an improvement in performance and efficiency.
Lastly, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers an upgraded CPU architecture and a higher transistor count compared to the Kirin 950. These improvements suggest that the Kirin 960 may offer better performance and efficiency. However, both processors have the same lithography and TDP, indicating similar power consumption.
In terms of the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 950 has 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Kirin 960 has 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This indicates that the Kirin 960 has an upgraded and more powerful CPU architecture compared to the Kirin 950.
In terms of the lithography, both processors have a 16 nm lithography process, which means they are built using the same manufacturing technology. This suggests that there may not be a significant difference in power efficiency between the two.
However, one notable difference is the number of transistors. The Kirin 950 has 2000 million transistors, while the Kirin 960 has 4000 million transistors. This indicates that the Kirin 960 has a higher transistor count, which generally implies an improvement in performance and efficiency.
Lastly, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers an upgraded CPU architecture and a higher transistor count compared to the Kirin 950. These improvements suggest that the Kirin 960 may offer better performance and efficiency. However, both processors have the same lithography and TDP, indicating similar power consumption.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | 4000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G71 MP8 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 8 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11.3 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2016 October |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | Hi3660 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
3
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
5
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Apple A15 Bionic
6
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
7
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Helio G88
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Unisoc SC7731E
9
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
10
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300