HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G with Samsung Exynos 9609. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | S5E9609 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Apple A14 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
3
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2
5
Unisoc T9100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
6
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
8
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Helio G88
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 vs MediaTek Helio G91
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080