HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920

VS
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them and analyze their features.

In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 950 features a combination of 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 boasts 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Both processors have 8 cores in total, allowing for efficient multitasking and performance.

When it comes to the instruction set, the Kirin 950 supports ARMv8-A, while the Dimensity 920 supports ARMv8.2-A. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has a more advanced instruction set, potentially leading to enhanced performance and efficiency.

In terms of lithography, the Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm process, while the Dimensity 920 utilizes a smaller 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally allows for improved energy efficiency and better overall performance due to tighter component integration.

The Kirin 950 has 2000 million transistors, whereas the Dimensity 920 does not specify this information. However, a higher transistor count generally indicates a more complex and powerful processor.

In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 950 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Kirin 950 is more power-efficient, potentially leading to longer battery life in devices that use this processor.

Additionally, the Dimensity 920 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which can accelerate AI-related tasks. Unfortunately, the Kirin 950 does not specify if it has an NPU.

In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 have their own unique set of specifications, the Dimensity 920 seems to have a slight advantage in terms of architecture, lithography, and potentially AI capabilities. However, further performance comparisons and real-world benchmarks would be necessary to determine which processor offers superior overall performance.

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores 8 8
Instruction Set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Number of transistors 2000 million
TDP 5 Watt 10 Watt
Neural Processing NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 4 GB up to 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR4 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 1333 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory-bus 2x32 bit 4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 2.0 UFS 3.1

Graphics

GPU name Mali-T880 MP4 Mali-G68 MP4
GPU Architecture Midgard Valhall
GPU frequency 900 MHz 950 MHz
Execution units 4 4
Shaders 64 96
DirectX 11.2 12
OpenCL API 1.2 2.0
OpenGL API ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.0 1.2

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 2520x1080@120Hz
Max camera resolution 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Max Video Capture FullHD@60fps 4K@30fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 0.3 Gbps 2.77 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.05 Gbps 1.2 Gbps
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth 4.2 5.2
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
QZSS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2015 November 2021 Quarter 3
Partnumber Hi3650 MT6877T
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Flagship Mid-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Kirin 950
135741
Dimensity 920
453634

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Kirin 950
341
Dimensity 920
780

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Kirin 950
1294
Dimensity 920
2594