HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G are two processors that have distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With 8 cores in total, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 16 nm and a TDP of 5 Watts. The Kirin 950 also boasts 2000 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G stands out with its advanced specifications. It is equipped with an architecture that includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 950, it also possesses 8 cores. The Kirin 9000 5G integrates the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a more advanced lithography of 5 nm. With a higher number of transistors at 15300 million, it offers a significant improvement compared to the Kirin 950. Additionally, the Kirin 9000 5G has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts.
Another notable feature of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is its neural processing capabilities. It incorporates Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny, as well as Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, which enhances its neural processing abilities.
In summary, while the HiSilicon Kirin 950 is a capable processor with a decent set of specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G outshines it in several aspects. With a more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, significantly higher number of transistors, and enhanced neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 9000 5G offers better performance and efficiency.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With 8 cores in total, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 16 nm and a TDP of 5 Watts. The Kirin 950 also boasts 2000 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G stands out with its advanced specifications. It is equipped with an architecture that includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 950, it also possesses 8 cores. The Kirin 9000 5G integrates the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a more advanced lithography of 5 nm. With a higher number of transistors at 15300 million, it offers a significant improvement compared to the Kirin 950. Additionally, the Kirin 9000 5G has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts.
Another notable feature of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is its neural processing capabilities. It incorporates Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny, as well as Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, which enhances its neural processing abilities.
In summary, while the HiSilicon Kirin 950 is a capable processor with a decent set of specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G outshines it in several aspects. With a more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, significantly higher number of transistors, and enhanced neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 9000 5G offers better performance and efficiency.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | 15300 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G78 MP24 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 760 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 24 |
Shaders | 64 | 384 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2020 October |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Google Tensor G1
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Helio G90
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
4
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
5
Apple A10 Fusion vs Unisoc Tiger T612
6
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
9
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus