HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T612 are both processors designed for mobile devices. While they have some similarities in terms of core count and instruction set, there are significant differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a good balance between high-performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 935 is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is not as advanced as some newer processors. It encompasses 1000 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watt, which indicates the amount of power it consumes during operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination offers good performance for multitasking and energy efficiency. The Tiger T612 boasts a more advanced 12 nm lithography process, resulting in smaller and more power-efficient transistors. However, it does have a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watt compared to the Kirin 935.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T612 have different strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 935 excels in terms of its higher clock speeds, while the Tiger T612 performs well in terms of its more advanced lithography process and efficient CPU architecture. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being used in.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a good balance between high-performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 935 is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is not as advanced as some newer processors. It encompasses 1000 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watt, which indicates the amount of power it consumes during operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination offers good performance for multitasking and energy efficiency. The Tiger T612 boasts a more advanced 12 nm lithography process, resulting in smaller and more power-efficient transistors. However, it does have a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watt compared to the Kirin 935.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T612 have different strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 935 excels in terms of its higher clock speeds, while the Tiger T612 performs well in terms of its more advanced lithography process and efficient CPU architecture. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | Hi3635 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
2
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
6
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
7
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
10
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Apple A13 Bionic