HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T612 are both processors designed for mobile devices. While they have some similarities in terms of core count and instruction set, there are significant differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a good balance between high-performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 935 is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is not as advanced as some newer processors. It encompasses 1000 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watt, which indicates the amount of power it consumes during operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination offers good performance for multitasking and energy efficiency. The Tiger T612 boasts a more advanced 12 nm lithography process, resulting in smaller and more power-efficient transistors. However, it does have a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watt compared to the Kirin 935.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T612 have different strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 935 excels in terms of its higher clock speeds, while the Tiger T612 performs well in terms of its more advanced lithography process and efficient CPU architecture. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being used in.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a good balance between high-performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 935 is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is not as advanced as some newer processors. It encompasses 1000 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watt, which indicates the amount of power it consumes during operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination offers good performance for multitasking and energy efficiency. The Tiger T612 boasts a more advanced 12 nm lithography process, resulting in smaller and more power-efficient transistors. However, it does have a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watt compared to the Kirin 935.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T612 have different strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 935 excels in terms of its higher clock speeds, while the Tiger T612 performs well in terms of its more advanced lithography process and efficient CPU architecture. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being used in.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 64 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | Hi3635 | T612 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek MT6739
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Helio A22
5
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Helio G35