HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors known for their performance and efficiency. While both processors have similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives a total of 8 cores and an ARMv8-A instruction set. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also has 8 cores, but with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
When it comes to lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 has a 28 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a much more advanced 7 nm lithography. This means that the Dimensity 700 has a smaller transistor size and is more power-efficient than the Kirin 935.
Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 935 has 1000 million transistors, but the Dimensity 700's transistor count is not specified. However, the Dimensity 700's more modern 7 nm lithography suggests that it might have a higher transistor count, which can positively impact performance and power efficiency.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Kirin 935 has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 700 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Kirin 935 is more power-efficient and generates less heat compared to the Dimensity 700.
Overall, both processors have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 935 may have a lower TDP and potentially greater transistor count, but the Dimensity 700 offers a more advanced lithography and configuration of cores for potentially better performance. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on specific requirements and preferences in terms of power efficiency and performance in various applications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives a total of 8 cores and an ARMv8-A instruction set. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also has 8 cores, but with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
When it comes to lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 has a 28 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a much more advanced 7 nm lithography. This means that the Dimensity 700 has a smaller transistor size and is more power-efficient than the Kirin 935.
Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 935 has 1000 million transistors, but the Dimensity 700's transistor count is not specified. However, the Dimensity 700's more modern 7 nm lithography suggests that it might have a higher transistor count, which can positively impact performance and power efficiency.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Kirin 935 has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 700 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Kirin 935 is more power-efficient and generates less heat compared to the Dimensity 700.
Overall, both processors have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 935 may have a lower TDP and potentially greater transistor count, but the Dimensity 700 offers a more advanced lithography and configuration of cores for potentially better performance. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on specific requirements and preferences in terms of power efficiency and performance in various applications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2520x1080@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 2K@30FPS |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi3635 | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Helio G95
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
3
Unisoc SC9832E vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
6
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 1280
9
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3