HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz - Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz - Cortex-A53. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a well-balanced performance. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The number of transistors in this processor is 1000 million, indicating a relatively high level of complexity. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt, meaning it consumes relatively low power for its performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 differs in its architecture and lithography. It features 2x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A75 and 6x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A55, offering a different balance between power and efficiency compared to the Kirin 930. With a total of 8 cores, it matches the Kirin 930 in terms of core count. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a smaller lithography of 12 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The TDP of the Tiger T618 is slightly higher at 10 Watt, suggesting it may consume more power than the Kirin 930. Additionally, the Tiger T618 offers Neural Processing capabilities with its NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can significantly enhance AI-related tasks.
In terms of specifications, both processors have their strengths. The Kirin 930 performs well with its balanced core configurations and lower power consumption. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 excels in AI-related tasks with its NPU and features a more advanced lithography for increased efficiency. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on the specific requirements of the intended application, such as power efficiency, AI capabilities, and overall performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz - Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz - Cortex-A53. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a well-balanced performance. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The number of transistors in this processor is 1000 million, indicating a relatively high level of complexity. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt, meaning it consumes relatively low power for its performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 differs in its architecture and lithography. It features 2x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A75 and 6x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A55, offering a different balance between power and efficiency compared to the Kirin 930. With a total of 8 cores, it matches the Kirin 930 in terms of core count. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a smaller lithography of 12 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The TDP of the Tiger T618 is slightly higher at 10 Watt, suggesting it may consume more power than the Kirin 930. Additionally, the Tiger T618 offers Neural Processing capabilities with its NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can significantly enhance AI-related tasks.
In terms of specifications, both processors have their strengths. The Kirin 930 performs well with its balanced core configurations and lower power consumption. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 excels in AI-related tasks with its NPU and features a more advanced lithography for increased efficiency. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on the specific requirements of the intended application, such as power efficiency, AI capabilities, and overall performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Google Tensor G1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Google Tensor G2
4
MediaTek Helio P60 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
6
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
7
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Apple A13 Bionic
8
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Apple A12 Bionic
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Helio G36
10
Unisoc SC9832E vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F