MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores (Cortex-A78) compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G is built on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is built on a more advanced 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and improved performance.
The MediaTek Dimensity 900 also boasts a higher number of transistors with 10000 million, indicating a more complex design. In contrast, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about the number of transistors.
When it comes to Neural Processing Units (NPU), both processors offer AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a specified rating of 10 Watts. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about its TDP.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher-performing CPU architecture, a more advanced lithography, and a higher number of transistors compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU. The TDP of the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is specified as 10 Watts.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores (Cortex-A78) compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G is built on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is built on a more advanced 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and improved performance.
The MediaTek Dimensity 900 also boasts a higher number of transistors with 10000 million, indicating a more complex design. In contrast, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about the number of transistors.
When it comes to Neural Processing Units (NPU), both processors offer AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a specified rating of 10 Watts. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about its TDP.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher-performing CPU architecture, a more advanced lithography, and a higher number of transistors compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU. The TDP of the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is specified as 10 Watts.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Apple A13 Bionic
2
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
4
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
5
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Helio P95
9
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
10
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G95