MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores (Cortex-A78) compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G is built on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is built on a more advanced 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and improved performance.
The MediaTek Dimensity 900 also boasts a higher number of transistors with 10000 million, indicating a more complex design. In contrast, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about the number of transistors.
When it comes to Neural Processing Units (NPU), both processors offer AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a specified rating of 10 Watts. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about its TDP.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher-performing CPU architecture, a more advanced lithography, and a higher number of transistors compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU. The TDP of the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is specified as 10 Watts.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores (Cortex-A78) compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G is built on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is built on a more advanced 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and improved performance.
The MediaTek Dimensity 900 also boasts a higher number of transistors with 10000 million, indicating a more complex design. In contrast, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about the number of transistors.
When it comes to Neural Processing Units (NPU), both processors offer AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a specified rating of 10 Watts. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does not provide information about its TDP.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher-performing CPU architecture, a more advanced lithography, and a higher number of transistors compared to the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers a Dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a single NPU. The TDP of the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is specified as 10 Watts.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
| TDP | 10 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | |
| Shaders | 64 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2960x1440@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | MT6877 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
2
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
7
Unisoc T820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
8
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Apple A15 Bionic
10
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1