HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the Unisoc SC9832E are two processors that differ in their specifications. Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features a total of 8 CPU cores, divided into two groups. The first group consists of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz, while the second group comprises four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. With an instruction set of ARMv8-A, this processor offers a balanced combination of performance and power efficiency. Fabricated using a 28 nm lithography process, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 houses around 1000 million transistors. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, this processor aims to deliver optimal performance while keeping power consumption in check.
Moving on to the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a simpler architecture compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930. It is equipped with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.4 GHz, offering adequate processing power for day-to-day tasks. Like the HiSilicon Kirin 930, the Unisoc SC9832E also utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. Fabricated using the same 28 nm lithography process, this processor houses a lower number of transistors compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930. The Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP of 7 Watts, indicating that it may consume slightly more power compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of CPU cores, clock speeds, and transistor count. It also boasts a lower TDP, indicating better power efficiency. However, the Unisoc SC9832E still offers a decent level of performance for everyday tasks. When it comes to choosing between the two processors, it ultimately depends on the desired level of performance and power efficiency required for the intended usage.
Moving on to the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a simpler architecture compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930. It is equipped with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.4 GHz, offering adequate processing power for day-to-day tasks. Like the HiSilicon Kirin 930, the Unisoc SC9832E also utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. Fabricated using the same 28 nm lithography process, this processor houses a lower number of transistors compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930. The Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP of 7 Watts, indicating that it may consume slightly more power compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of CPU cores, clock speeds, and transistor count. It also boasts a lower TDP, indicating better power efficiency. However, the Unisoc SC9832E still offers a decent level of performance for everyday tasks. When it comes to choosing between the two processors, it ultimately depends on the desired level of performance and power efficiency required for the intended usage.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2018 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Unisoc SC9863A
3
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
7
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
10
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Unisoc Tiger T310