HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors that are commonly used in smartphones and other electronic devices. While both processors have their own unique features, they also have several differences when it comes to their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, this processor features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of eight cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and fast processing speeds. The instruction set for the Kirin 930 is ARMv8-A, enabling it to handle a wide range of applications. With a lithography of 28 nm, it is suitable for devices that require power efficiency. The Kirin 930 has a TDP of 5 Watt, making it an energy-efficient choice.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it also has a total of eight cores. However, the Dimensity 920 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which offers improved performance and efficiency. With a smaller lithography of 6 nm, this processor is more advanced in terms of power efficiency compared to the Kirin 930. It also has a TDP of 10 Watt, indicating slightly higher power consumption. Another notable feature of the Dimensity 920 is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have different specifications that cater to varying needs. The Kirin 930 focuses on power efficiency with its 28 nm lithography and lower TDP of 5 Watt. Meanwhile, the Dimensity 920 offers improved overall performance with its advanced 6 nm lithography, higher TDP of 10 Watt, and the addition of an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between power efficiency and performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, this processor features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of eight cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and fast processing speeds. The instruction set for the Kirin 930 is ARMv8-A, enabling it to handle a wide range of applications. With a lithography of 28 nm, it is suitable for devices that require power efficiency. The Kirin 930 has a TDP of 5 Watt, making it an energy-efficient choice.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it also has a total of eight cores. However, the Dimensity 920 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which offers improved performance and efficiency. With a smaller lithography of 6 nm, this processor is more advanced in terms of power efficiency compared to the Kirin 930. It also has a TDP of 10 Watt, indicating slightly higher power consumption. Another notable feature of the Dimensity 920 is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have different specifications that cater to varying needs. The Kirin 930 focuses on power efficiency with its 28 nm lithography and lower TDP of 5 Watt. Meanwhile, the Dimensity 920 offers improved overall performance with its advanced 6 nm lithography, higher TDP of 10 Watt, and the addition of an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between power efficiency and performance.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 96 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi3630 | MT6877T |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
2
MediaTek Helio G100 vs Samsung Exynos 7885
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
4
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
5
Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
6
MediaTek Helio G81 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
7
Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800