HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors that are commonly used in smartphones and other electronic devices. While both processors have their own unique features, they also have several differences when it comes to their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, this processor features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of eight cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and fast processing speeds. The instruction set for the Kirin 930 is ARMv8-A, enabling it to handle a wide range of applications. With a lithography of 28 nm, it is suitable for devices that require power efficiency. The Kirin 930 has a TDP of 5 Watt, making it an energy-efficient choice.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it also has a total of eight cores. However, the Dimensity 920 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which offers improved performance and efficiency. With a smaller lithography of 6 nm, this processor is more advanced in terms of power efficiency compared to the Kirin 930. It also has a TDP of 10 Watt, indicating slightly higher power consumption. Another notable feature of the Dimensity 920 is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have different specifications that cater to varying needs. The Kirin 930 focuses on power efficiency with its 28 nm lithography and lower TDP of 5 Watt. Meanwhile, the Dimensity 920 offers improved overall performance with its advanced 6 nm lithography, higher TDP of 10 Watt, and the addition of an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between power efficiency and performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, this processor features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of eight cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and fast processing speeds. The instruction set for the Kirin 930 is ARMv8-A, enabling it to handle a wide range of applications. With a lithography of 28 nm, it is suitable for devices that require power efficiency. The Kirin 930 has a TDP of 5 Watt, making it an energy-efficient choice.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it also has a total of eight cores. However, the Dimensity 920 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which offers improved performance and efficiency. With a smaller lithography of 6 nm, this processor is more advanced in terms of power efficiency compared to the Kirin 930. It also has a TDP of 10 Watt, indicating slightly higher power consumption. Another notable feature of the Dimensity 920 is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have different specifications that cater to varying needs. The Kirin 930 focuses on power efficiency with its 28 nm lithography and lower TDP of 5 Watt. Meanwhile, the Dimensity 920 offers improved overall performance with its advanced 6 nm lithography, higher TDP of 10 Watt, and the addition of an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between power efficiency and performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
3
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Helio P70
8
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810