HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T616

VS
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and Unisoc Tiger T616 processors, several key differences stand out.

Firstly, in terms of architecture and CPU cores, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a more powerful setup. It utilizes a combination of Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55 cores, with a 1x 3.13 GHz, 3x 2.54 GHz, and 4x 2.05 GHz configuration. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 consists of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, with a 2x 2.0 GHz and 6x 1.8 GHz configuration.

Both processors have 8 cores and operate on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering efficient and advanced performance. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a clear advantage with its faster clock speeds, indicating potentially better overall performance.

Another significant difference lies in the lithography and power consumption. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G adopts a newer 5 nm lithography, which allows for greater transistor density and potentially improved energy efficiency. It has around 15300 million transistors and a lower TDP of 6 Watts.

On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 operates on a 12 nm lithography, which is less advanced compared to the Kirin 9000E 5G. Its TDP stands at 10 Watts, indicating a higher power consumption.

Furthermore, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G boasts additional features in the form of its Neural Processing capabilities. It utilizes Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, which enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks.

In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T616 in several aspects. It has a more potent CPU configuration, a more advanced 5 nm lithography, lower power consumption, and additional Neural Processing capabilities. These differences suggest that the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G might deliver better overall performance and efficiency.

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores 8 8
Instruction Set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Number of transistors 15300 million
TDP 6 Watt 10 Watt
Neural Processing Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 16 GB up to 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 1866 MHz
Memory-bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP22 Mali-G57 MP1
GPU Architecture Valhall Bifrost
GPU frequency 760 MHz 750 MHz
Execution units 22 1
Shaders 352 16
DirectX 12 11
OpenCL API 2.1 2.1
OpenGL API ES 3.2 ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.2 1.2

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 3840x2160 2400x1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP
Max Video Capture 4K@60fps FullHD@60fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 4.6 Gbps 0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 2.5 Gbps 0.1 Gbps
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2020 October 2021
Partnumber T616
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Flagship Mid-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Kirin 9000E 5G
737022
Tiger T616
229175

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Kirin 9000E 5G
1059
Tiger T616
386

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Kirin 9000E 5G
3702
Tiger T616
1385