HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and Unisoc SC7731E are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it offers impressive CPU capabilities. It features a powerful architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With eight cores in total, this processor can handle demanding tasks efficiently. Additionally, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software. The Kirin 9000E 5G is built using a 5 nm lithography process, which results in improved power efficiency and performance. It contains a staggering 15300 million transistors, indicating its advanced design. With a TDP of 6 Watts, it offers a balance between power consumption and high performance. Furthermore, it incorporates neural processing capabilities with the Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, enhancing its artificial intelligence capabilities.
In contrast, the Unisoc SC7731E has more modest specifications. Its architecture consists of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, providing a lower level of performance compared to the Kirin 9000E 5G. With four cores in total, it has fewer resources for multitasking and demanding applications. The SC7731E utilizes ARMv7-A instruction set, which might limit its compatibility with certain modern software. It is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is larger compared to the Kirin 9000E 5G, potentially resulting in higher power consumption and reduced performance. The TDP of the SC7731E is 7 Watts, slightly more than the Kirin 9000E 5G.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G stands out with its powerful architecture, advanced lithography, and neural processing capabilities. It offers greater performance and power efficiency compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. On the other hand, the SC7731E may be suitable for simpler tasks that do not require intensive processing power. It is essential to consider these specifications when choosing a processor, depending on individual requirements and usage scenarios.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it offers impressive CPU capabilities. It features a powerful architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With eight cores in total, this processor can handle demanding tasks efficiently. Additionally, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software. The Kirin 9000E 5G is built using a 5 nm lithography process, which results in improved power efficiency and performance. It contains a staggering 15300 million transistors, indicating its advanced design. With a TDP of 6 Watts, it offers a balance between power consumption and high performance. Furthermore, it incorporates neural processing capabilities with the Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, enhancing its artificial intelligence capabilities.
In contrast, the Unisoc SC7731E has more modest specifications. Its architecture consists of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, providing a lower level of performance compared to the Kirin 9000E 5G. With four cores in total, it has fewer resources for multitasking and demanding applications. The SC7731E utilizes ARMv7-A instruction set, which might limit its compatibility with certain modern software. It is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is larger compared to the Kirin 9000E 5G, potentially resulting in higher power consumption and reduced performance. The TDP of the SC7731E is 7 Watts, slightly more than the Kirin 9000E 5G.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G stands out with its powerful architecture, advanced lithography, and neural processing capabilities. It offers greater performance and power efficiency compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. On the other hand, the SC7731E may be suitable for simpler tasks that do not require intensive processing power. It is essential to consider these specifications when choosing a processor, depending on individual requirements and usage scenarios.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 533 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 1 |
| Shaders | 352 | 4 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 1440x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | HD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 Quarter 2 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
3
Unisoc T820 vs Apple A16 Bionic
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
5
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Google Tensor G3
6
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Helio G200
7
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Apple A17 Pro
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4