HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 8895. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Exynos M2 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G71 MP20 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 20 |
| Shaders | 352 | 320 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 1 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2017 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E8895 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
2
Apple A13 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T620
3
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
4
Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
5
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
6
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
8
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
9
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
10
MediaTek Dimensity 7360 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955