Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, lithography, TDP, and neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, offering a balanced performance. It operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, which indicates that it was manufactured using the older 28 nanometer process. Additionally, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 3 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption. It also boasts an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables it to handle neural processing tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G boasts a more advanced architecture. It features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. The use of Cortex-A75 cores suggests better performance compared to the SC9863A. Additionally, this processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, similar to the SC9863A. However, it has a smaller lithography of 12 nm, indicating a more recent and efficient manufacturing process. Another notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which suggests improved capabilities for handling neural processing tasks.
In summary, while both processors have similar CPU core counts and instruction sets, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a slightly more advanced architecture with Cortex-A75 cores and a smaller lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it possesses dual NPU for enhanced neural processing abilities. However, it's worth noting that other factors like cache sizes, performance benchmarks, and software optimization can also influence the overall performance and efficiency of these processors.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, offering a balanced performance. It operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, which indicates that it was manufactured using the older 28 nanometer process. Additionally, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 3 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption. It also boasts an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables it to handle neural processing tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G boasts a more advanced architecture. It features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. The use of Cortex-A75 cores suggests better performance compared to the SC9863A. Additionally, this processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, similar to the SC9863A. However, it has a smaller lithography of 12 nm, indicating a more recent and efficient manufacturing process. Another notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which suggests improved capabilities for handling neural processing tasks.
In summary, while both processors have similar CPU core counts and instruction sets, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a slightly more advanced architecture with Cortex-A75 cores and a smaller lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it possesses dual NPU for enhanced neural processing abilities. However, it's worth noting that other factors like cache sizes, performance benchmarks, and software optimization can also influence the overall performance and efficiency of these processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 128 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
7
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
8
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
9
MediaTek Helio P90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
10
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs MediaTek Helio G95