Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, lithography, TDP, and neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, offering a balanced performance. It operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, which indicates that it was manufactured using the older 28 nanometer process. Additionally, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 3 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption. It also boasts an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables it to handle neural processing tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G boasts a more advanced architecture. It features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. The use of Cortex-A75 cores suggests better performance compared to the SC9863A. Additionally, this processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, similar to the SC9863A. However, it has a smaller lithography of 12 nm, indicating a more recent and efficient manufacturing process. Another notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which suggests improved capabilities for handling neural processing tasks.
In summary, while both processors have similar CPU core counts and instruction sets, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a slightly more advanced architecture with Cortex-A75 cores and a smaller lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it possesses dual NPU for enhanced neural processing abilities. However, it's worth noting that other factors like cache sizes, performance benchmarks, and software optimization can also influence the overall performance and efficiency of these processors.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, offering a balanced performance. It operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, which indicates that it was manufactured using the older 28 nanometer process. Additionally, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 3 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption. It also boasts an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables it to handle neural processing tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G boasts a more advanced architecture. It features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. The use of Cortex-A75 cores suggests better performance compared to the SC9863A. Additionally, this processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, similar to the SC9863A. However, it has a smaller lithography of 12 nm, indicating a more recent and efficient manufacturing process. Another notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which suggests improved capabilities for handling neural processing tasks.
In summary, while both processors have similar CPU core counts and instruction sets, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a slightly more advanced architecture with Cortex-A75 cores and a smaller lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it possesses dual NPU for enhanced neural processing abilities. However, it's worth noting that other factors like cache sizes, performance benchmarks, and software optimization can also influence the overall performance and efficiency of these processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 128 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
3
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
5
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 990
6
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
7
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
10
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690