HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 3 |
| Shaders | 352 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9925 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
2
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
4
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
5
Google Tensor G5 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
6
Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Google Tensor G4
8
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs MediaTek Helio G80
9
MediaTek Helio G81 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G