HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 3 |
| Shaders | 352 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9925 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
4
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Apple A13 Bionic
6
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Apple A11 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9611