HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.20 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 585 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | SM8250-AC | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Apple A14 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Google Tensor G4
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
4
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5
MediaTek MT6739 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
6
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
7
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
8
MediaTek Helio G91 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Helio P95
10
Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e