HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
The comparison between HiSilicon Kirin 930 and HiSilicon Kirin 980 processors reveals significant differences in their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 930 features a quad-core setup with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. On the other hand, the Kirin 980 boasts a more powerful configuration with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 1.92 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is evident that the Kirin 980 offers higher performance due to its higher clock speeds and advanced Cortex-A76 architecture.
Additionally, when considering the lithography, the Kirin 930 utilizes a 28 nm manufacturing process, while the Kirin 980 is built using a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography allows for better power efficiency, increased transistor density, and improved overall performance. This makes the Kirin 980 more energy-efficient and capable of delivering higher performance levels.
Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 930 houses 1000 million transistors, whereas the Kirin 980 incorporates a whopping 6900 million transistors. This demonstrates a significant leap in transistor count, indicating a higher level of complexity and capability in the Kirin 980.
Furthermore, the thermal design power (TDP) of the Kirin 930 stands at 5 Watts, whereas the Kirin 980 has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts. While the TDP difference may not be considerable, it suggests that the Kirin 980 may generate a little more heat under heavy loads.
Moreover, a notable feature exclusive to the Kirin 980 is the inclusion of the HiSilicon Dual NPU, which stands for Neural Processing Unit. This dedicated hardware for artificial intelligence tasks enables the processor to deliver superior performance in machine learning and AI-related applications.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 outperforms the Kirin 930 in various aspects. With its superior CPU cores, advanced lithography, significantly higher transistor count, and the addition of the dual NPU, the Kirin 980 represents a significant improvement in terms of performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 930 features a quad-core setup with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. On the other hand, the Kirin 980 boasts a more powerful configuration with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 1.92 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is evident that the Kirin 980 offers higher performance due to its higher clock speeds and advanced Cortex-A76 architecture.
Additionally, when considering the lithography, the Kirin 930 utilizes a 28 nm manufacturing process, while the Kirin 980 is built using a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography allows for better power efficiency, increased transistor density, and improved overall performance. This makes the Kirin 980 more energy-efficient and capable of delivering higher performance levels.
Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 930 houses 1000 million transistors, whereas the Kirin 980 incorporates a whopping 6900 million transistors. This demonstrates a significant leap in transistor count, indicating a higher level of complexity and capability in the Kirin 980.
Furthermore, the thermal design power (TDP) of the Kirin 930 stands at 5 Watts, whereas the Kirin 980 has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts. While the TDP difference may not be considerable, it suggests that the Kirin 980 may generate a little more heat under heavy loads.
Moreover, a notable feature exclusive to the Kirin 980 is the inclusion of the HiSilicon Dual NPU, which stands for Neural Processing Unit. This dedicated hardware for artificial intelligence tasks enables the processor to deliver superior performance in machine learning and AI-related applications.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 outperforms the Kirin 930 in various aspects. With its superior CPU cores, advanced lithography, significantly higher transistor count, and the addition of the dual NPU, the Kirin 980 represents a significant improvement in terms of performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | 6900 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 720 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 10 |
Shaders | 64 | 160 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 3120x1440 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.4 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2018 Quarter 4 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
2
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Helio P35
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
5
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio G70
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
7
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Google Tensor G2
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
10
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus