HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 670. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 (Kryo 360 Gold) 6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 360 Silver) |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 685 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 615 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 700 MHz |
Execution units | 22 | 2 |
Shaders | 352 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2560x1600 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | SDM670 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Google Tensor G2
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Helio G35
3
Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 7904
4
Unisoc T820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
6
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
9
MediaTek Helio G200 vs Google Tensor G5
10
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000