HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with MediaTek Dimensity 1050. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | MediaTek APU 550 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G610 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | |
| Execution units | 22 | 3 |
| Shaders | 352 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2022 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | MT6879 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 8895
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
4
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
5
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
10
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek MT6739