HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with varying specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it has a more advanced and powerful architecture. It consists of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination of cores allows for efficient multitasking and high-performance computing. The Kirin 9000 5G is built on a 5 nm lithography, making it highly energy-efficient. It also boasts a large number of transistors at 15,300 million, which contributes to its overall processing power. Additionally, it features Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny neural processing units, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, providing enhanced capabilities for artificial intelligence tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has a slightly different architecture. It includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it may not have as high clock speeds as the Kirin 9000 5G, it still offers sufficient performance for everyday tasks. The Tanggula T760 5G is built on a slightly larger 6 nm lithography, but it still maintains efficient power consumption with a TDP of 5 watts. It features an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables AI capabilities, though it may not be as advanced as the Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny NPUs of the Kirin 9000 5G.
In conclusion, both processors have their unique strengths. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G excels in architecture, clock speeds, and its advanced neural processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G offers a balanced performance with a slightly different architecture and an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on specific requirements and preferences, whether it is demanding multitasking, efficient power consumption, or AI processing power.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it has a more advanced and powerful architecture. It consists of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination of cores allows for efficient multitasking and high-performance computing. The Kirin 9000 5G is built on a 5 nm lithography, making it highly energy-efficient. It also boasts a large number of transistors at 15,300 million, which contributes to its overall processing power. Additionally, it features Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny neural processing units, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, providing enhanced capabilities for artificial intelligence tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has a slightly different architecture. It includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it may not have as high clock speeds as the Kirin 9000 5G, it still offers sufficient performance for everyday tasks. The Tanggula T760 5G is built on a slightly larger 6 nm lithography, but it still maintains efficient power consumption with a TDP of 5 watts. It features an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables AI capabilities, though it may not be as advanced as the Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny NPUs of the Kirin 9000 5G.
In conclusion, both processors have their unique strengths. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G excels in architecture, clock speeds, and its advanced neural processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G offers a balanced performance with a slightly different architecture and an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on specific requirements and preferences, whether it is demanding multitasking, efficient power consumption, or AI processing power.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 6 |
Shaders | 384 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 February |
Partnumber | T760 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 990
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Helio G95
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
7
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
8
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
9
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820