HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 24 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Xclipse 920 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Xclipse |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 555 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 3 |
Shaders | 384 | 192 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2022 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | S5E9925 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A10X Fusion vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
2
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Google Tensor G1
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
6
Unisoc SC9863A vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
7
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Unisoc Tiger T618
8
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
9
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus