HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Prime) 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 670 Silver) |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 770 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 642L |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 4 |
Shaders | 384 | 384 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@144Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 1x 36MP + 1x 22MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 4 |
Partnumber | SM7325-AE | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Apple A18
2
MediaTek Helio G99 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
3
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
5
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Google Tensor G5
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
9
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
10
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4