HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T700 are two processors that differ in terms of their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it boasts a powerful CPU architecture with a combination of different cores. It features 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a good balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. With a TDP of 6 Watts, it is designed to consume less power and generate less heat. Additionally, the Kirin 820 5G includes Neural Processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Huawei Da Vinci Architecture, enabling advanced AI processing tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features a different CPU architecture. It consists of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it offers a similar number of cores as the Kirin 820 5G, the Tiger T700's architecture is less powerful and efficient compared to the Kirin's Cortex-A76 cores. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a TDP of 10 Watts, it consumes more power and may generate more heat than the Kirin 820 5G.
Overall, while both processors have eight cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G stands out with its more powerful and efficient CPU cores, smaller lithography size, lower TDP, and additional Neural Processing capabilities. These specifications make the Kirin 820 5G a suitable choice for users who require a high-performance and power-efficient processor for various applications and tasks, including AI processing.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it boasts a powerful CPU architecture with a combination of different cores. It features 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a good balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. With a TDP of 6 Watts, it is designed to consume less power and generate less heat. Additionally, the Kirin 820 5G includes Neural Processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Huawei Da Vinci Architecture, enabling advanced AI processing tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features a different CPU architecture. It consists of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it offers a similar number of cores as the Kirin 820 5G, the Tiger T700's architecture is less powerful and efficient compared to the Kirin's Cortex-A76 cores. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a TDP of 10 Watts, it consumes more power and may generate more heat than the Kirin 820 5G.
Overall, while both processors have eight cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G stands out with its more powerful and efficient CPU cores, smaller lithography size, lower TDP, and additional Neural Processing capabilities. These specifications make the Kirin 820 5G a suitable choice for users who require a high-performance and power-efficient processor for various applications and tasks, including AI processing.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2021 March |
Partnumber | T700 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Helio P95
3
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
5
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
6
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs MediaTek Helio G88
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
10
MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G90T