HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T612 are two processors that offer different specifications and capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, this processor features a more advanced architecture with a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. It includes 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a range of performance levels for different tasks. With a 7 nm lithography, it offers improved efficiency and power consumption. The Kirin 820 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, meaning it operates at a relatively low power level. Additionally, it integrates the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for neural processing, enabling enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 employs a different architecture, utilizing Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it offers a similar number of cores as the Kirin 820, the Tiger T612 has a 12 nm lithography, which is slightly less advanced. This processor has a higher TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting that it may consume more power.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various software and applications. However, the Kirin 820 5G has an advantage with its 7 nm lithography, providing better energy efficiency. The Unisoc Tiger T612, on the other hand, has a higher power consumption with its 12 nm lithography.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T612 offer different specifications and performance capabilities. The Kirin 820 stands out with its advanced architecture, lower power consumption, and AI processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Tiger T612 may provide a decent performance but lacks the efficiency and AI processing advancements of the Kirin 820. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on specific usage requirements and priorities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, this processor features a more advanced architecture with a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. It includes 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a range of performance levels for different tasks. With a 7 nm lithography, it offers improved efficiency and power consumption. The Kirin 820 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, meaning it operates at a relatively low power level. Additionally, it integrates the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for neural processing, enabling enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 employs a different architecture, utilizing Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it offers a similar number of cores as the Kirin 820, the Tiger T612 has a 12 nm lithography, which is slightly less advanced. This processor has a higher TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting that it may consume more power.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various software and applications. However, the Kirin 820 5G has an advantage with its 7 nm lithography, providing better energy efficiency. The Unisoc Tiger T612, on the other hand, has a higher power consumption with its 12 nm lithography.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T612 offer different specifications and performance capabilities. The Kirin 820 stands out with its advanced architecture, lower power consumption, and AI processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Tiger T612 may provide a decent performance but lacks the efficiency and AI processing advancements of the Kirin 820. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on specific usage requirements and priorities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2022 January |
Partnumber | T612 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Samsung Exynos 8895
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Unisoc SC7731E
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
6
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
7
MediaTek Helio G70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Helio G36
10
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T710