HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors that offer 5G connectivity. Although they have similar numbers of cores and instruction sets, there are some notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it features an architecture comprised of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination allows for a balance of power and efficiency. With a lithography of 7 nm, this processor is built for optimal performance while keeping power consumption low, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 watts. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G also boasts Ascend D110 Lite Neural Processing and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, enhancing its capabilities in artificial intelligence (AI) tasks.
The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, on the other hand, features an architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it may not have the same high-performance cores as the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it offers a balanced combination for everyday tasks. The Tanggula T740 5G has a lithography of 12 nm, which may result in slightly higher power consumption and lower efficiency compared to the Kirin 820 5G. However, the Tanggula T740 5G benefits from Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), showcasing its capabilities in AI tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are both processors that offer 5G connectivity. The Kirin 820 5G stands out with its powerful Cortex-A76 cores and advanced neural processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a balanced combination of cores and features dual NPUs for efficient AI processing. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or application they are intended for.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it features an architecture comprised of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination allows for a balance of power and efficiency. With a lithography of 7 nm, this processor is built for optimal performance while keeping power consumption low, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 watts. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G also boasts Ascend D110 Lite Neural Processing and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, enhancing its capabilities in artificial intelligence (AI) tasks.
The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, on the other hand, features an architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While it may not have the same high-performance cores as the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it offers a balanced combination for everyday tasks. The Tanggula T740 5G has a lithography of 12 nm, which may result in slightly higher power consumption and lower efficiency compared to the Kirin 820 5G. However, the Tanggula T740 5G benefits from Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), showcasing its capabilities in AI tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are both processors that offer 5G connectivity. The Kirin 820 5G stands out with its powerful Cortex-A76 cores and advanced neural processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers a balanced combination of cores and features dual NPUs for efficient AI processing. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or application they are intended for.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | T740, Tiger T7510 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
2
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
5
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
6
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
8
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
10
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Google Tensor G2