HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-X1 (Kryo 680 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 680 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 680 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 10300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Qualcomm Hexagon 780 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Adreno 660 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 2 |
| Shaders | 96 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 64MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 March | 2021 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | SM8350 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio P95
2
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Helio P22
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
4
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
7
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Helio P60
8
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
9
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
10
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000