HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two powerful processors that offer impressive specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core setup. The Kirin 820 has a configuration of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 boasts 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Kirin 820 offers a higher number of total cores, the Dimensity 820 provides faster clock speeds on its A76 cores.
Both processors are based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a lithography of 7 nm. This indicates that they are both built using advanced manufacturing processes, ensuring energy efficiency and improved performance.
When it comes to power consumption, the Kirin 820 is more energy-efficient with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watt, while the Dimensity 820 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watt. This means that the Kirin 820 consumes less power, making it more suitable for devices that prioritize longer battery life.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 820 utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, while the Dimensity 820 incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit). Although both processors offer neural processing capabilities, the specific architecture and capabilities may vary.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are powerful processors that offer impressive specifications. The choice between them would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being used in. The Kirin 820 excels in energy efficiency, while the Dimensity 820 offers faster clock speeds on its A76 cores.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core setup. The Kirin 820 has a configuration of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 boasts 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Kirin 820 offers a higher number of total cores, the Dimensity 820 provides faster clock speeds on its A76 cores.
Both processors are based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a lithography of 7 nm. This indicates that they are both built using advanced manufacturing processes, ensuring energy efficiency and improved performance.
When it comes to power consumption, the Kirin 820 is more energy-efficient with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watt, while the Dimensity 820 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watt. This means that the Kirin 820 consumes less power, making it more suitable for devices that prioritize longer battery life.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 820 utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, while the Dimensity 820 incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit). Although both processors offer neural processing capabilities, the specific architecture and capabilities may vary.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are powerful processors that offer impressive specifications. The choice between them would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being used in. The Kirin 820 excels in energy efficiency, while the Dimensity 820 offers faster clock speeds on its A76 cores.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 5 |
Shaders | 96 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2020 May |
Partnumber | MT6875 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G36
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
4
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
5
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
6
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
8
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 7904
10
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680