HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 are both powerful processors used in smartphones. While they share some similarities in terms of architecture, instruction set, and lithography, there are notable differences that set them apart.

Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it boasts a more extensive array of CPU cores and architecture. It has 8 cores, consisting of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55. This diverse combination offers a balanced performance for a range of tasks. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 features 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores, it still delivers a satisfactory performance.

In terms of instruction set, both processors utilize ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility and efficiency in running applications. Their lithography, or the size of their transistors, is also the same at 7 nm. This indicates that both processors are manufactured using the latest technology, resulting in improved power efficiency and better thermal control.

One key difference lies in the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has a TDP of 6 Watt, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a TDP of 10 Watt. This suggests that the Kirin 820 5G is more power-efficient, which can lead to longer battery life and reduced heat generation.

Another distinction is in their neural processing capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G features the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, which provide advanced AI-related functions. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 employs an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for enhanced AI performance.

In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 are solid processors designed for smartphones. The Kirin 820 5G excels in terms of CPU cores, power efficiency, and AI capabilities, while the Dimensity 800 offers good performance and AI processing with its fewer cores. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device and its user.