HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 980 processors, some notable differences can be seen.
Starting with their CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 820 5G features 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 980 offers 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have a total of 8 cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 820 5G utilizes ARMv8.2-A, while the Kirin 980 uses ARMv8-A. This implies that the Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced instruction set.
Both processors have a lithography of 7 nm, meaning they have relatively small transistors and can offer improved power efficiency. Additionally, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which refers to the maximum amount of power they generate under typical operating conditions.
When it comes to neural processing, the Kirin 820 5G incorporates the Ascend D110 Lite with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture. Meanwhile, the Kirin 980 features the HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). Although both processors offer neural processing capabilities, the specific architecture and units differ between the two.
However, it is worth mentioning that the Kirin 980 has a higher number of transistors, with 6900 million, suggesting it may have a higher level of complexity and potential performance.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 980 processors have some similarities in terms of their lithography, TDP, and the number of CPU cores, they also have distinguishing features. The Kirin 820 5G utilizes a different instruction set and neural processing architecture compared to the Kirin 980, which may result in varying levels of performance and capabilities.
Starting with their CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 820 5G features 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 980 offers 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have a total of 8 cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 820 5G utilizes ARMv8.2-A, while the Kirin 980 uses ARMv8-A. This implies that the Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced instruction set.
Both processors have a lithography of 7 nm, meaning they have relatively small transistors and can offer improved power efficiency. Additionally, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which refers to the maximum amount of power they generate under typical operating conditions.
When it comes to neural processing, the Kirin 820 5G incorporates the Ascend D110 Lite with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture. Meanwhile, the Kirin 980 features the HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). Although both processors offer neural processing capabilities, the specific architecture and units differ between the two.
However, it is worth mentioning that the Kirin 980 has a higher number of transistors, with 6900 million, suggesting it may have a higher level of complexity and potential performance.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 980 processors have some similarities in terms of their lithography, TDP, and the number of CPU cores, they also have distinguishing features. The Kirin 820 5G utilizes a different instruction set and neural processing architecture compared to the Kirin 980, which may result in varying levels of performance and capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 10 |
| Shaders | 96 | 160 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 1.4 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 March | 2018 Quarter 4 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
3
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
6
Apple A19 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)
8
MediaTek Helio G50 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Samsung Exynos 2600
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350