HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G are two processors developed by HiSilicon, a subsidiary of Huawei. Both processors come with advanced features and are designed to cater to the needs of modern-day smartphone users.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it offers a combination of powerful CPU cores and architecture. It consists of one Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.36 GHz, three Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.22 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.84 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced performance for multitasking and everyday usage.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G takes the performance to another level with its upgraded CPU cores and architecture. It includes one Cortex-A77 core clocked at 3.13 GHz, three Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.54 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz. This configuration offers a significant boost in processing power, making it suitable for heavy tasks such as gaming and video editing.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications. Moreover, they both come with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which ensures efficient power usage and thermal management, contributing to longer battery life.
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is built on a 7nm lithography process, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G takes it a step further with a 5nm lithography process. This smaller process node allows for more transistors to be packed into the same space, resulting in improved performance and energy efficiency. Speaking of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G boasts 15.3 billion transistors, indicating its high level of integration.
Both processors feature advanced Neural Processing Units (NPU) for AI-related tasks. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G comes with the Ascend D110 Lite NPU, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has the Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny NPUs, both based on Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture. These NPUs enhance the overall AI capabilities of the processors, enabling features like advanced photography, language translation, and augmented reality.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G offers a solid performance for everyday use, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G takes it a step further with its superior CPU cores, lithography process, and increased transistor count. However, the specific suitability of each processor depends on the individual user's requirements and preferences.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it offers a combination of powerful CPU cores and architecture. It consists of one Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.36 GHz, three Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.22 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.84 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced performance for multitasking and everyday usage.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G takes the performance to another level with its upgraded CPU cores and architecture. It includes one Cortex-A77 core clocked at 3.13 GHz, three Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.54 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz. This configuration offers a significant boost in processing power, making it suitable for heavy tasks such as gaming and video editing.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications. Moreover, they both come with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which ensures efficient power usage and thermal management, contributing to longer battery life.
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is built on a 7nm lithography process, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G takes it a step further with a 5nm lithography process. This smaller process node allows for more transistors to be packed into the same space, resulting in improved performance and energy efficiency. Speaking of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G boasts 15.3 billion transistors, indicating its high level of integration.
Both processors feature advanced Neural Processing Units (NPU) for AI-related tasks. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G comes with the Ascend D110 Lite NPU, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has the Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny NPUs, both based on Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture. These NPUs enhance the overall AI capabilities of the processors, enabling features like advanced photography, language translation, and augmented reality.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G offers a solid performance for everyday use, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G takes it a step further with its superior CPU cores, lithography process, and increased transistor count. However, the specific suitability of each processor depends on the individual user's requirements and preferences.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP22 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 760 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 22 |
Shaders | 96 | 352 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2020 October |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
3
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
6
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
7
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
9
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
10
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 8890