HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It is built using a 7 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is equipped with the Ascend D110 Lite Neural Processing Unit, which utilizes the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts a more powerful CPU architecture. It comprises 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like its counterpart, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 9000 5G is built using a smaller 5 nm lithography process. It incorporates a staggering 15,300 million transistors and has a TDP of 6 Watts. The Kirin 9000 5G features an upgraded Neural Processing Unit, with the combination of Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x), utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
In comparison, the Kirin 9000 5G is a more advanced processor than the Kirin 820 5G. It offers higher clock speeds across its cores, resulting in potentially better performance. The smaller 5 nm lithography process allows for increased transistor count, which could lead to improved efficiency and power consumption. Furthermore, the upgraded Neural Processing Unit on the Kirin 9000 5G, incorporating Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny, suggests enhanced AI capabilities.
While the Kirin 820 5G is a capable processor, particularly for mid-range devices, the Kirin 9000 5G stands out as a flagship-level processor with superior specifications. Its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography process, and advanced Neural Processing Unit make it a superior choice for demanding tasks and applications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It is built using a 7 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is equipped with the Ascend D110 Lite Neural Processing Unit, which utilizes the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts a more powerful CPU architecture. It comprises 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like its counterpart, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 9000 5G is built using a smaller 5 nm lithography process. It incorporates a staggering 15,300 million transistors and has a TDP of 6 Watts. The Kirin 9000 5G features an upgraded Neural Processing Unit, with the combination of Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x), utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
In comparison, the Kirin 9000 5G is a more advanced processor than the Kirin 820 5G. It offers higher clock speeds across its cores, resulting in potentially better performance. The smaller 5 nm lithography process allows for increased transistor count, which could lead to improved efficiency and power consumption. Furthermore, the upgraded Neural Processing Unit on the Kirin 9000 5G, incorporating Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny, suggests enhanced AI capabilities.
While the Kirin 820 5G is a capable processor, particularly for mid-range devices, the Kirin 9000 5G stands out as a flagship-level processor with superior specifications. Its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography process, and advanced Neural Processing Unit make it a superior choice for demanding tasks and applications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP24 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 760 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 24 |
| Shaders | 96 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 March | 2020 October |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Apple A18
4
Apple A11 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1280
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
9
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs HiSilicon Kirin 930