HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, lithography, instruction set, and neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it features a powerful architecture consisting of 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, which indicates greater energy efficiency and superior performance. With 6900 million transistors, the Kirin 810 offers a robust processing capability. It has a low TDP of 5 Watts, making it suitable for power-efficient devices. Additionally, it incorporates the Ascend D100 Lite and the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for efficient neural processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features an architecture comprising 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 810, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a larger lithography of 12 nm, which may result in slightly lower energy efficiency compared to the Kirin 810. The Tiger T710 incorporates a Dual NPU for neural processing, enhancing its performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
In terms of specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T710 in several areas. The Kirin 810 offers a more advanced architecture with Cortex-A76 cores, which are more powerful than the Cortex-A75 cores found in the Tiger T710. Moreover, the Kirin 810 operates at a smaller lithography, indicating better energy efficiency. Additionally, the Kirin 810 incorporates the Ascend D100 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, further improving its neural processing capabilities.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the Unisoc Tiger T710 possess similar instruction sets and core counts, the Kirin 810 boasts a more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, and enhanced neural processing capabilities. Thus, the Kirin 810 is likely to deliver better overall performance compared to the Tiger T710.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it features a powerful architecture consisting of 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, which indicates greater energy efficiency and superior performance. With 6900 million transistors, the Kirin 810 offers a robust processing capability. It has a low TDP of 5 Watts, making it suitable for power-efficient devices. Additionally, it incorporates the Ascend D100 Lite and the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for efficient neural processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features an architecture comprising 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 810, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a larger lithography of 12 nm, which may result in slightly lower energy efficiency compared to the Kirin 810. The Tiger T710 incorporates a Dual NPU for neural processing, enhancing its performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
In terms of specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T710 in several areas. The Kirin 810 offers a more advanced architecture with Cortex-A76 cores, which are more powerful than the Cortex-A75 cores found in the Tiger T710. Moreover, the Kirin 810 operates at a smaller lithography, indicating better energy efficiency. Additionally, the Kirin 810 incorporates the Ascend D100 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, further improving its neural processing capabilities.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the Unisoc Tiger T710 possess similar instruction sets and core counts, the Kirin 810 boasts a more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, and enhanced neural processing capabilities. Thus, the Kirin 810 is likely to deliver better overall performance compared to the Tiger T710.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.88 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D100 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | |
| Shaders | 96 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 2 | 2019 |
| Partnumber | Hi6280 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G88
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5
Apple M4 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
6
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Apple A13 Bionic
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2