HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and Unisoc SC9832E are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it features an architecture of 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It is manufactured using a 7 nm lithography process and consists of 6900 million transistors. The thermal design power (TDP) of the Kirin 810 is 5 Watts. Additionally, it incorporates a neural processing unit known as the Ascend D100 Lite, which is based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E has an architecture consisting of 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of 4 cores and supports the ARMv8-A instruction set. The SC9832E is manufactured using a 28 nm lithography process and has a TDP of 7 Watts.
Comparing the two processors, the Kirin 810 has a higher number of CPU cores (8 cores compared to 4 cores in the SC9832E), which can potentially result in better multitasking capabilities and overall performance. Moreover, the Kirin 810 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which generally leads to improved power efficiency and higher clock speeds. In contrast, the SC9832E is manufactured using a less efficient 28 nm process.
The Kirin 810 also stands out with its neural processing unit, the Ascend D100 Lite, which is designed to enhance AI-related tasks. This can be advantageous for applications and tasks that require artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities. However, it is important to note that the SC9832E does not have a dedicated neural processing unit.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 offers a higher number of CPU cores, an advanced 7 nm lithography process, and a dedicated neural processing unit. These specifications suggest that the Kirin 810 may deliver better performance and power efficiency compared to the Unisoc SC9832E, making it more suitable for demanding tasks and AI-related applications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it features an architecture of 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It is manufactured using a 7 nm lithography process and consists of 6900 million transistors. The thermal design power (TDP) of the Kirin 810 is 5 Watts. Additionally, it incorporates a neural processing unit known as the Ascend D100 Lite, which is based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E has an architecture consisting of 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of 4 cores and supports the ARMv8-A instruction set. The SC9832E is manufactured using a 28 nm lithography process and has a TDP of 7 Watts.
Comparing the two processors, the Kirin 810 has a higher number of CPU cores (8 cores compared to 4 cores in the SC9832E), which can potentially result in better multitasking capabilities and overall performance. Moreover, the Kirin 810 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which generally leads to improved power efficiency and higher clock speeds. In contrast, the SC9832E is manufactured using a less efficient 28 nm process.
The Kirin 810 also stands out with its neural processing unit, the Ascend D100 Lite, which is designed to enhance AI-related tasks. This can be advantageous for applications and tasks that require artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities. However, it is important to note that the SC9832E does not have a dedicated neural processing unit.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 offers a higher number of CPU cores, an advanced 7 nm lithography process, and a dedicated neural processing unit. These specifications suggest that the Kirin 810 may deliver better performance and power efficiency compared to the Unisoc SC9832E, making it more suitable for demanding tasks and AI-related applications.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.88 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D100 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 2 | 2018 |
Partnumber | Hi6280 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
3
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Google Tensor G3
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
6
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Apple A10X Fusion
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
9
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
10
Unisoc SC7731E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636