HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the HiSilicon Kirin 955 are two processors designed by Huawei's semiconductor department. Let's compare their specifications to understand their differences.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, this processor features an architecture that includes 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating that it operates at a low power consumption level. Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 includes the Ascend D100 Lite neural processing unit, which utilizes Huawei's Da Vinci architecture for improved artificial intelligence capabilities.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 comes with a different set of specifications. It has an architecture that consists of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm, which is slightly less advanced compared to the 7 nm of the Kirin 810. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a decent level of performance but may not be as efficient as the Kirin 810. Similar to the Kirin 810, the TDP of the Kirin 955 is also 5 Watts.
In terms of the number of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 stands out with 6900 million transistors, while the Kirin 955 has 2000 million transistors. The higher number of transistors typically indicates a more complex and advanced design, suggesting that the Kirin 810 may have a technological edge over the Kirin 955.
Overall, while both processors offer a total of 8 cores and have the same TDP, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 appears to have a more advanced architecture, a smaller lithography, and a significantly higher number of transistors compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 955. These specifications indicate that the Kirin 810 may offer better performance and power efficiency, particularly in tasks that require artificial intelligence capabilities.
It's important to note that specifications alone do not provide a complete picture of a processor's performance, as real-world results can be influenced by various factors such as software optimization and other hardware components.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, this processor features an architecture that includes 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating that it operates at a low power consumption level. Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 includes the Ascend D100 Lite neural processing unit, which utilizes Huawei's Da Vinci architecture for improved artificial intelligence capabilities.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 comes with a different set of specifications. It has an architecture that consists of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm, which is slightly less advanced compared to the 7 nm of the Kirin 810. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a decent level of performance but may not be as efficient as the Kirin 810. Similar to the Kirin 810, the TDP of the Kirin 955 is also 5 Watts.
In terms of the number of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 stands out with 6900 million transistors, while the Kirin 955 has 2000 million transistors. The higher number of transistors typically indicates a more complex and advanced design, suggesting that the Kirin 810 may have a technological edge over the Kirin 955.
Overall, while both processors offer a total of 8 cores and have the same TDP, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 appears to have a more advanced architecture, a smaller lithography, and a significantly higher number of transistors compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 955. These specifications indicate that the Kirin 810 may offer better performance and power efficiency, particularly in tasks that require artificial intelligence capabilities.
It's important to note that specifications alone do not provide a complete picture of a processor's performance, as real-world results can be influenced by various factors such as software optimization and other hardware components.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.88 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | 2000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D100 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-T880 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 4 |
Shaders | 96 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 2 | 2016 April |
Partnumber | Hi6280 | Hi3655 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
2
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Helio G80
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
4
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
7
MediaTek Helio P35 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Unisoc Tiger T610
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200