HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and Kirin 935 are two powerful processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Kirin 810, it features a 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture, along with 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor is built on a 7 nm lithography process and boasts a total of 6900 million transistors. With a low TDP of 5 watts, it offers impressive power efficiency. Additionally, the Kirin 810 is equipped with the Ascend D100 Lite neural processing unit, based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, allowing for efficient AI performance.
On the other hand, the Kirin 935 showcases a different architecture. It consists of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Like the Kirin 810, it also has 8 cores, but it operates on a 28 nm lithography node and has 1000 million transistors. The TDP of the Kirin 935 is slightly higher at 7 watts.
Comparing the two processors, it is clear that the Kirin 810 has an advantage when it comes to the lithography process, with the more advanced 7 nm technology allowing for better performance and power efficiency. It also holds an advantage in terms of the number of transistors, with almost seven times more than the Kirin 935. Additionally, the Kirin 810 benefits from the advanced Ascend D100 Lite neural processing unit, providing superior AI capabilities.
However, the Kirin 935 does have its merits. It offers a higher clock speed for its cortex-A53 cores, with a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz. This could result in slightly better single-threaded performance in certain applications.
In conclusion, the Kirin 810 surpasses the Kirin 935 in key areas such as lithography, transistor count, and AI capabilities. However, the Kirin 935 may still appeal to users who prioritize higher clock speeds for specific tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
Starting with the Kirin 810, it features a 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture, along with 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor is built on a 7 nm lithography process and boasts a total of 6900 million transistors. With a low TDP of 5 watts, it offers impressive power efficiency. Additionally, the Kirin 810 is equipped with the Ascend D100 Lite neural processing unit, based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, allowing for efficient AI performance.
On the other hand, the Kirin 935 showcases a different architecture. It consists of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Like the Kirin 810, it also has 8 cores, but it operates on a 28 nm lithography node and has 1000 million transistors. The TDP of the Kirin 935 is slightly higher at 7 watts.
Comparing the two processors, it is clear that the Kirin 810 has an advantage when it comes to the lithography process, with the more advanced 7 nm technology allowing for better performance and power efficiency. It also holds an advantage in terms of the number of transistors, with almost seven times more than the Kirin 935. Additionally, the Kirin 810 benefits from the advanced Ascend D100 Lite neural processing unit, providing superior AI capabilities.
However, the Kirin 935 does have its merits. It offers a higher clock speed for its cortex-A53 cores, with a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz. This could result in slightly better single-threaded performance in certain applications.
In conclusion, the Kirin 810 surpasses the Kirin 935 in key areas such as lithography, transistor count, and AI capabilities. However, the Kirin 935 may still appeal to users who prioritize higher clock speeds for specific tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.88 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | 1000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D100 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-T628 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 4 |
Shaders | 96 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 2 | 2015 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi6280 | Hi3635 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Samsung Exynos 990
2
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
4
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Helio P35
5
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Helio A25
6
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Apple A12 Bionic
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
9
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Helio G35