HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors that cater to different market segments. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features an architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed for efficient multitasking. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and utilizes a 12 nm lithography process. The Kirin 710F is equipped with around 5500 million transistors, showcasing its robustness. Furthermore, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating its energy efficiency.
On the other hand, we have the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. It features an architecture that includes 4 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor is similar to the Kirin 710F in terms of the number of cores, with a total of 8 cores as well. However, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering a more advanced instruction set architecture. With a 12 nm lithography process, the Tanggula T740 5G is efficient in power consumption. It also boasts an additional feature, the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks.
In summary, both processors are capable performers in their respective categories. While the HiSilicon Kirin 710F showcases its strength in multitasking with its CPU cores, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers a more advanced instruction set architecture and includes a Neural Processing Unit for AI-related tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user or device manufacturer.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features an architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed for efficient multitasking. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and utilizes a 12 nm lithography process. The Kirin 710F is equipped with around 5500 million transistors, showcasing its robustness. Furthermore, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating its energy efficiency.
On the other hand, we have the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. It features an architecture that includes 4 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor is similar to the Kirin 710F in terms of the number of cores, with a total of 8 cores as well. However, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering a more advanced instruction set architecture. With a 12 nm lithography process, the Tanggula T740 5G is efficient in power consumption. It also boasts an additional feature, the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks.
In summary, both processors are capable performers in their respective categories. While the HiSilicon Kirin 710F showcases its strength in multitasking with its CPU cores, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers a more advanced instruction set architecture and includes a Neural Processing Unit for AI-related tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user or device manufacturer.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | |
| Shaders | 64 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Helio G50
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Samsung Exynos 980
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
7
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
8
Apple M5 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
9
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400