HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc SC9863A are two processors that are frequently used in mobile devices. While they both have their own strengths and weaknesses, comparing their specifications can help provide insight into their performance capabilities.
Regarding their CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710F boasts a more powerful setup with 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 cores. In contrast, the SC9863A features 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. The Kirin 710F's Cortex-A73 cores offer better performance for demanding tasks, providing a faster and more efficient user experience.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors share the same number: 8 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and improved performance when handling various applications simultaneously.
When it comes to the instruction set, the Kirin 710F operates on the ARMv8-A, while the SC9863A uses the ARMv8.2-A. The ARMv8.2-A instruction set in the SC9863A delivers enhanced performance and improved security features, which can be advantageous for more advanced tasks and applications.
The fabrication process, or lithography, of both processors differs significantly. The Kirin 710F is built on a 12 nm process, whereas the SC9863A is manufactured on a 28 nm process. A smaller lithography generally indicates better power efficiency and higher performance.
Moreover, the Kirin 710F possesses around 5500 million transistors, whereas the number of transistors in the SC9863A is unknown. A higher number of transistors often suggests enhanced performance and capabilities.
When considering power consumption, the SC9863A holds an advantage with a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 Watts, while the Kirin 710F has a TDP of 5 Watts. This means that the SC9863A is more power-efficient, leading to longer battery life and less heat generation.
Lastly, it is worth noting that the SC9863A stands out due to the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This feature enables advanced artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities and enhances performance in AI-driven applications, such as image recognition and voice assistants.
Overall, the comparison of specifications reveals that the Kirin 710F showcases superior performance in terms of CPU cores, architecture, and fabrication process. However, the SC9863A demonstrates advantages in power efficiency and the presence of an NPU for AI-centric tasks. Understanding these specifications can help individuals make informed decisions when choosing between the two processors for their devices.
Regarding their CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710F boasts a more powerful setup with 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 cores. In contrast, the SC9863A features 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. The Kirin 710F's Cortex-A73 cores offer better performance for demanding tasks, providing a faster and more efficient user experience.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors share the same number: 8 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and improved performance when handling various applications simultaneously.
When it comes to the instruction set, the Kirin 710F operates on the ARMv8-A, while the SC9863A uses the ARMv8.2-A. The ARMv8.2-A instruction set in the SC9863A delivers enhanced performance and improved security features, which can be advantageous for more advanced tasks and applications.
The fabrication process, or lithography, of both processors differs significantly. The Kirin 710F is built on a 12 nm process, whereas the SC9863A is manufactured on a 28 nm process. A smaller lithography generally indicates better power efficiency and higher performance.
Moreover, the Kirin 710F possesses around 5500 million transistors, whereas the number of transistors in the SC9863A is unknown. A higher number of transistors often suggests enhanced performance and capabilities.
When considering power consumption, the SC9863A holds an advantage with a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 Watts, while the Kirin 710F has a TDP of 5 Watts. This means that the SC9863A is more power-efficient, leading to longer battery life and less heat generation.
Lastly, it is worth noting that the SC9863A stands out due to the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This feature enables advanced artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities and enhances performance in AI-driven applications, such as image recognition and voice assistants.
Overall, the comparison of specifications reveals that the Kirin 710F showcases superior performance in terms of CPU cores, architecture, and fabrication process. However, the SC9863A demonstrates advantages in power efficiency and the presence of an NPU for AI-centric tasks. Understanding these specifications can help individuals make informed decisions when choosing between the two processors for their devices.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 550 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
3
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Helio G85
5
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 8890
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
9
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
10
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Helio A25