MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors that offer different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it features a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, with two Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores and is built on a 12 nm lithography process. It has an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A and a TDP of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 also offers a different architecture, consisting of four Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores running at the same frequency of 2.0 GHz. This processor has a total of four cores and is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process. It also has an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A and a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, it comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
In terms of architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a higher number of cores compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800. However, the Dimensity 800 compensates for this with a more advanced lithography process, providing potentially better power efficiency and performance. Furthermore, the Dimensity 800's inclusion of an NPU adds AI capabilities that the Tiger T700 lacks.
Overall, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific use cases and requirements. If multitasking and performance are key factors, the Unisoc Tiger T700's higher number of cores may be an advantage. However, if power efficiency and AI-related tasks are more important, the MediaTek Dimensity 800's advanced lithography and NPU could be more suitable.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it features a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, with two Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores and is built on a 12 nm lithography process. It has an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A and a TDP of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 also offers a different architecture, consisting of four Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores running at the same frequency of 2.0 GHz. This processor has a total of four cores and is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process. It also has an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A and a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, it comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
In terms of architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a higher number of cores compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800. However, the Dimensity 800 compensates for this with a more advanced lithography process, providing potentially better power efficiency and performance. Furthermore, the Dimensity 800's inclusion of an NPU adds AI capabilities that the Tiger T700 lacks.
Overall, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific use cases and requirements. If multitasking and performance are key factors, the Unisoc Tiger T700's higher number of cores may be an advantage. However, if power efficiency and AI-related tasks are more important, the MediaTek Dimensity 800's advanced lithography and NPU could be more suitable.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 March |
| Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T700 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
2
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
4
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 7360
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
10
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2