HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and HiSilicon Kirin 950 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features a 12 nm lithography and consists of 8 cores. The processor architecture includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With an ARMv8-A instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F has a total of 5500 million transistors. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography and also includes 8 cores. Its architecture comprises 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710F, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 950 has a lesser number of transistors compared to the Kirin 710F, with a total of 2000 million. The TDP remains the same at 5 Watts for this processor.
In terms of the processors' specifications, it is evident that the Kirin 710F operates on a smaller nanometer lithography, which generally translates to improved energy efficiency and better performance. Additionally, the Kirin 710F offers a higher number of transistors, indicating a more intricate design. However, the Kirin 950 outperforms the Kirin 710F in terms of maximum clock frequency, as it has faster Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz versus the Kirin 710F's 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores.
Overall, both processors are built with 8 cores and the ARMv8-A instruction set, but their differences lie in their lithography, number of transistors, and the clock frequencies of their respective core architectures. It is important for consumers to consider these specifications when choosing a processor, as they can greatly impact the performance and efficiency of the devices they power.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features a 12 nm lithography and consists of 8 cores. The processor architecture includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With an ARMv8-A instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F has a total of 5500 million transistors. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography and also includes 8 cores. Its architecture comprises 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710F, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 950 has a lesser number of transistors compared to the Kirin 710F, with a total of 2000 million. The TDP remains the same at 5 Watts for this processor.
In terms of the processors' specifications, it is evident that the Kirin 710F operates on a smaller nanometer lithography, which generally translates to improved energy efficiency and better performance. Additionally, the Kirin 710F offers a higher number of transistors, indicating a more intricate design. However, the Kirin 950 outperforms the Kirin 710F in terms of maximum clock frequency, as it has faster Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz versus the Kirin 710F's 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores.
Overall, both processors are built with 8 cores and the ARMv8-A instruction set, but their differences lie in their lithography, number of transistors, and the clock frequencies of their respective core architectures. It is important for consumers to consider these specifications when choosing a processor, as they can greatly impact the performance and efficiency of the devices they power.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | 2000 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-T880 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 64 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2015 November |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3650 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek Helio A22
2
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
3
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
5
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Apple A19
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
7
Apple M1 (iPad) vs Apple A16 Bionic
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
9
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
10
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030