HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 are two processors that offer different specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 955 has 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, while the Tiger T616 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores compared to the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 955 uses ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T616 uses ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Tiger T616 has a newer version of the ARM instruction set compared to the Kirin 955.
The lithography is also different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a lithography of 16 nm, while the Tiger T616 has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and performance.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) is different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T616 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP can indicate better power efficiency and less heat generated during operation.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 have different specifications. The Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T616 has a newer instruction set with its ARMv8.2-A. The Tiger T616 also has a smaller lithography, indicating potentially better power efficiency. However, the Kirin 955 has a lower TDP, suggesting it may generate less heat during operation. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 955 has 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, while the Tiger T616 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores compared to the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 955 uses ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T616 uses ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Tiger T616 has a newer version of the ARM instruction set compared to the Kirin 955.
The lithography is also different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a lithography of 16 nm, while the Tiger T616 has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and performance.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) is different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T616 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP can indicate better power efficiency and less heat generated during operation.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 have different specifications. The Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T616 has a newer instruction set with its ARMv8.2-A. The Tiger T616 also has a smaller lithography, indicating potentially better power efficiency. However, the Kirin 955 has a lower TDP, suggesting it may generate less heat during operation. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2021 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
3
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 850
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Helio P60
6
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
7
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
10
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Samsung Exynos 7870