HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 are two processors that offer different specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 955 has 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, while the Tiger T616 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores compared to the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 955 uses ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T616 uses ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Tiger T616 has a newer version of the ARM instruction set compared to the Kirin 955.
The lithography is also different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a lithography of 16 nm, while the Tiger T616 has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and performance.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) is different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T616 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP can indicate better power efficiency and less heat generated during operation.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 have different specifications. The Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T616 has a newer instruction set with its ARMv8.2-A. The Tiger T616 also has a smaller lithography, indicating potentially better power efficiency. However, the Kirin 955 has a lower TDP, suggesting it may generate less heat during operation. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 955 has 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, while the Tiger T616 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores compared to the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 955 uses ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T616 uses ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Tiger T616 has a newer version of the ARM instruction set compared to the Kirin 955.
The lithography is also different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a lithography of 16 nm, while the Tiger T616 has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and performance.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) is different for these processors. The Kirin 955 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T616 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP can indicate better power efficiency and less heat generated during operation.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 have different specifications. The Kirin 955 has a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T616 has a newer instruction set with its ARMv8.2-A. The Tiger T616 also has a smaller lithography, indicating potentially better power efficiency. However, the Kirin 955 has a lower TDP, suggesting it may generate less heat during operation. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2021 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
2
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
4
Apple A11 Bionic vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
6
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
7
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Apple A15 Bionic
8
Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Unisoc Tiger T612