HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are both processors used in mobile devices, but they have some differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features a combination of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Tanggula T760 5G comes with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Tanggula T760 5G has a slightly higher clock speed for both sets of cores, potentially leading to better performance.
Looking at other specifications, both processors have 8 cores and use the ARMv8 architecture, but the Tanggula T760 5G utilizes the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Additionally, the Kirin 710A has a lithography of 14 nm, while the Tanggula T760 5G features a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography can result in improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
It is worth mentioning that the Tanggula T760 5G also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU can enhance the processor's capabilities in performing machine learning tasks and enable features such as facial recognition, object detection, and more. The Kirin 710A, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated NPU.
When comparing the two processors' thermal design power (TDP), they both have a rating of 5 Watts. This means that they are designed to operate within similar power consumption limits.
In summary, the Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the Kirin 710A in certain areas. It has a slightly higher clock speed, utilizes the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set, features a more advanced 6 nm lithography for improved efficiency, and includes an NPU for enhanced machine learning capabilities. However, it is essential to consider other factors such as software optimization and overall device integration when evaluating the performance of a mobile device.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features a combination of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Tanggula T760 5G comes with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Tanggula T760 5G has a slightly higher clock speed for both sets of cores, potentially leading to better performance.
Looking at other specifications, both processors have 8 cores and use the ARMv8 architecture, but the Tanggula T760 5G utilizes the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Additionally, the Kirin 710A has a lithography of 14 nm, while the Tanggula T760 5G features a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography can result in improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
It is worth mentioning that the Tanggula T760 5G also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU can enhance the processor's capabilities in performing machine learning tasks and enable features such as facial recognition, object detection, and more. The Kirin 710A, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated NPU.
When comparing the two processors' thermal design power (TDP), they both have a rating of 5 Watts. This means that they are designed to operate within similar power consumption limits.
In summary, the Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the Kirin 710A in certain areas. It has a slightly higher clock speed, utilizes the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set, features a more advanced 6 nm lithography for improved efficiency, and includes an NPU for enhanced machine learning capabilities. However, it is essential to consider other factors such as software optimization and overall device integration when evaluating the performance of a mobile device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A12 Bionic vs Apple A13 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
3
MediaTek Helio G37 vs MediaTek Helio G25
4
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
5
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
6
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
9
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
10
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Unisoc Tiger T612