HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G are two processors created by HiSilicon. These processors are often used in smartphones and tablets. Let's compare their specifications to determine their differences.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A consists of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock speed and a more advanced architecture.
When it comes to the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking and improved performance. However, the Kirin 985 5G has a more powerful and diverse combination of cores, which may result in better overall performance.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A has a 14 nm process, while the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography enables better power efficiency and improved performance.
The instruction set used by the Kirin 710A is ARMv8-A, while the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Kirin 985 5G's use of a later instruction set suggests improved compatibility and optimization for newer applications.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Kirin 710A has a TDP of 5 watts, while the Kirin 985 5G has a higher TDP of 6 watts. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G may generate more heat during operation.
Additionally, the Kirin 985 5G boasts neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny. This allows for enhanced AI processing and improved performance in tasks such as facial recognition and image processing.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is a more powerful and advanced processor compared to the Kirin 710A. It features a higher clock speed, a more diverse core combination, a smaller lithography, and additional neural processing capabilities. However, it is important to consider the overall device's design and optimization, as these factors also contribute to the device's performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A consists of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock speed and a more advanced architecture.
When it comes to the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking and improved performance. However, the Kirin 985 5G has a more powerful and diverse combination of cores, which may result in better overall performance.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A has a 14 nm process, while the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography enables better power efficiency and improved performance.
The instruction set used by the Kirin 710A is ARMv8-A, while the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Kirin 985 5G's use of a later instruction set suggests improved compatibility and optimization for newer applications.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Kirin 710A has a TDP of 5 watts, while the Kirin 985 5G has a higher TDP of 6 watts. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G may generate more heat during operation.
Additionally, the Kirin 985 5G boasts neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny. This allows for enhanced AI processing and improved performance in tasks such as facial recognition and image processing.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is a more powerful and advanced processor compared to the Kirin 710A. It features a higher clock speed, a more diverse core combination, a smaller lithography, and additional neural processing capabilities. However, it is important to consider the overall device's design and optimization, as these factors also contribute to the device's performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G77 MP8 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 8 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 3120x1440 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fp |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 1.4 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi6290 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Google Tensor G2 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
3
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Apple A15 Bionic
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Helio G88
5
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
6
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs MediaTek Helio P65
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs MediaTek Helio P70
10
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821