HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 are both processors designed by HiSilicon, but they differ in terms of their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, this processor boasts a total of 8 cores, split between 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. The processor is based on the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built using a 14 nm lithography process. It houses 5500 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 also features 8 cores, but with a slightly different configuration. It consists of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. Similar to the Kirin 710A, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, it is built using a more advanced 10 nm lithography process. It also contains 5500 million transistors but has a higher TDP of 9 Watts. Additionally, the Kirin 970 is equipped with the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 have comparable CPU configurations, with 8 cores in total. The Kirin 710A operates at slightly lower clock speeds but has a lower TDP compared to the Kirin 970. However, the Kirin 970 boasts a more advanced lithography process, enabling better power efficiency. Furthermore, the Kirin 970 comes equipped with the HiSilicon NPU, giving it an edge in AI-related tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the desired balance of performance, power consumption, and AI capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, this processor boasts a total of 8 cores, split between 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. The processor is based on the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built using a 14 nm lithography process. It houses 5500 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 also features 8 cores, but with a slightly different configuration. It consists of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. Similar to the Kirin 710A, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, it is built using a more advanced 10 nm lithography process. It also contains 5500 million transistors but has a higher TDP of 9 Watts. Additionally, the Kirin 970 is equipped with the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 have comparable CPU configurations, with 8 cores in total. The Kirin 710A operates at slightly lower clock speeds but has a lower TDP compared to the Kirin 970. However, the Kirin 970 boasts a more advanced lithography process, enabling better power efficiency. Furthermore, the Kirin 970 comes equipped with the HiSilicon NPU, giving it an edge in AI-related tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the desired balance of performance, power consumption, and AI capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | 5500 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 12 |
| Shaders | 64 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2017 September |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3670 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4
MediaTek Helio G37 vs MediaTek Helio G88
5
Apple A19 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
6
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
8
Apple A15 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
9
Apple A18 vs Apple A12 Bionic
10
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Helio G36