HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tiger T610 are both processors designed for mobile devices. They have similar characteristics, such as the same number of CPU cores and lithography size.
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 features a combination of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. This arrangement allows for a balanced performance, with the more powerful Cortex-A73 cores handling demanding tasks, while the Cortex-A53 cores handle less intensive ones. With a total of eight cores, the Kirin 710 can efficiently multitask and deliver smooth performance. Its 12 nm lithography allows for decent power efficiency, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at the same speed. This configuration also offers a balance between power and efficiency, with the Cortex-A55 cores focusing on low-power tasks and the Cortex-A75 cores handling more demanding tasks. Like the Kirin 710, the Tiger T610 has eight cores and a 12 nm lithography. However, the TDP for this processor is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
When comparing the two processors, it is clear that they have different CPU core arrangements, with the Kirin 710 favoring performance and power efficiency, while the Tiger T610 focuses more on a balance between power and efficiency. The Kirin 710's higher clock speed on its powerful Cortex-A73 cores may allow for slightly better performance in intensive tasks, while the Tiger T610's lower TDP may result in improved power efficiency.
Ultimately, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tiger T610 will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device being used. Users looking for a processor that offers greater performance may prefer the Kirin 710, while those prioritizing power efficiency may lean towards the Tiger T610.
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 features a combination of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. This arrangement allows for a balanced performance, with the more powerful Cortex-A73 cores handling demanding tasks, while the Cortex-A53 cores handle less intensive ones. With a total of eight cores, the Kirin 710 can efficiently multitask and deliver smooth performance. Its 12 nm lithography allows for decent power efficiency, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at the same speed. This configuration also offers a balance between power and efficiency, with the Cortex-A55 cores focusing on low-power tasks and the Cortex-A75 cores handling more demanding tasks. Like the Kirin 710, the Tiger T610 has eight cores and a 12 nm lithography. However, the TDP for this processor is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
When comparing the two processors, it is clear that they have different CPU core arrangements, with the Kirin 710 favoring performance and power efficiency, while the Tiger T610 focuses more on a balance between power and efficiency. The Kirin 710's higher clock speed on its powerful Cortex-A73 cores may allow for slightly better performance in intensive tasks, while the Tiger T610's lower TDP may result in improved power efficiency.
Ultimately, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tiger T610 will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device being used. Users looking for a processor that offers greater performance may prefer the Kirin 710, while those prioritizing power efficiency may lean towards the Tiger T610.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Google Tensor G3
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Unisoc SC9832E
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
4
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
6
MediaTek Helio A25 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
7
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio G35
8
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs MediaTek Helio G85
9
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
10
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000