HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with distinct specifications and characteristics.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, this processor boasts an impressive architecture that includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is capable of delivering efficient performance. The Instruction Set is ARMv8-A, which supports modern applications and processes. Another notable feature is the 12 nm lithography, meaning the transistor density is higher compared to processors with larger lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 also contains 5500 million transistors, which further enhances its performance capabilities. In terms of power consumption, this processor has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating that it consumes more power compared to other processors in its category.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A offers a different set of specifications. It features 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a balance between power and efficiency. With 8 cores in total, this processor can handle various tasks and applications. The Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, which is compatible with the latest software and technology. However, the Unisoc SC9863A has a larger lithography of 28 nm, meaning it has a lower transistor density compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 710. One unique feature of this processor is the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for AI and machine learning tasks. Additionally, it has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, indicating better power efficiency compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 710.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc SC9863A processors have their own strengths and weaknesses. While the HiSilicon Kirin 710 boasts a higher transistor density and slightly higher clock speeds, it consumes more power. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A offers better power efficiency and includes an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device or application they will be utilized in.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, this processor boasts an impressive architecture that includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is capable of delivering efficient performance. The Instruction Set is ARMv8-A, which supports modern applications and processes. Another notable feature is the 12 nm lithography, meaning the transistor density is higher compared to processors with larger lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 also contains 5500 million transistors, which further enhances its performance capabilities. In terms of power consumption, this processor has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating that it consumes more power compared to other processors in its category.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A offers a different set of specifications. It features 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a balance between power and efficiency. With 8 cores in total, this processor can handle various tasks and applications. The Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, which is compatible with the latest software and technology. However, the Unisoc SC9863A has a larger lithography of 28 nm, meaning it has a lower transistor density compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 710. One unique feature of this processor is the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for AI and machine learning tasks. Additionally, it has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, indicating better power efficiency compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 710.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc SC9863A processors have their own strengths and weaknesses. While the HiSilicon Kirin 710 boasts a higher transistor density and slightly higher clock speeds, it consumes more power. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A offers better power efficiency and includes an NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device or application they will be utilized in.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G50
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Apple A14 Bionic
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
4
MediaTek Helio G100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
5
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Apple A15 Bionic
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
8
Unisoc Tiger T620 vs MediaTek Helio P65
9
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Helio G95
10
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400