HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors that cater to different segments of the market. While both processors have similarities in terms of the number of cores, instruction set, and architecture, they differ significantly in terms of power and performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a lithography of 12 nm, this processor boasts a TDP of 5 watts, making it more power-efficient. It has a significant number of transistors, weighing in at 5500 million. The Kirin 710 is known for its reliability and smooth performance, especially in mid-range devices.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a 7 nm lithography, this processor offers enhanced efficiency and processing power. It also has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating it might require more power. The Dimensity 820 equips a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and can deliver improved performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a reliable mid-range processor, known for its power efficiency. It offers decent performance for daily tasks and is suitable for devices with moderate processing requirements. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is targeted towards more demanding users, with its powerful architecture and NPU. It is designed to handle intensive tasks and provide a smoother user experience. Both processors have their own strengths, catering to different needs and preferences in the market.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a lithography of 12 nm, this processor boasts a TDP of 5 watts, making it more power-efficient. It has a significant number of transistors, weighing in at 5500 million. The Kirin 710 is known for its reliability and smooth performance, especially in mid-range devices.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a 7 nm lithography, this processor offers enhanced efficiency and processing power. It also has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating it might require more power. The Dimensity 820 equips a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and can deliver improved performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a reliable mid-range processor, known for its power efficiency. It offers decent performance for daily tasks and is suitable for devices with moderate processing requirements. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is targeted towards more demanding users, with its powerful architecture and NPU. It is designed to handle intensive tasks and provide a smoother user experience. Both processors have their own strengths, catering to different needs and preferences in the market.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 5 |
| Shaders | 64 | 80 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2020 May |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6875 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
4
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
7
Apple A10X Fusion vs MediaTek Helio G25
8
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Google Tensor G5
9
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
10
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Helio P65