HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors that cater to different segments of the market. While both processors have similarities in terms of the number of cores, instruction set, and architecture, they differ significantly in terms of power and performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a lithography of 12 nm, this processor boasts a TDP of 5 watts, making it more power-efficient. It has a significant number of transistors, weighing in at 5500 million. The Kirin 710 is known for its reliability and smooth performance, especially in mid-range devices.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a 7 nm lithography, this processor offers enhanced efficiency and processing power. It also has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating it might require more power. The Dimensity 820 equips a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and can deliver improved performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a reliable mid-range processor, known for its power efficiency. It offers decent performance for daily tasks and is suitable for devices with moderate processing requirements. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is targeted towards more demanding users, with its powerful architecture and NPU. It is designed to handle intensive tasks and provide a smoother user experience. Both processors have their own strengths, catering to different needs and preferences in the market.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a lithography of 12 nm, this processor boasts a TDP of 5 watts, making it more power-efficient. It has a significant number of transistors, weighing in at 5500 million. The Kirin 710 is known for its reliability and smooth performance, especially in mid-range devices.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a 7 nm lithography, this processor offers enhanced efficiency and processing power. It also has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating it might require more power. The Dimensity 820 equips a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and can deliver improved performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a reliable mid-range processor, known for its power efficiency. It offers decent performance for daily tasks and is suitable for devices with moderate processing requirements. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is targeted towards more demanding users, with its powerful architecture and NPU. It is designed to handle intensive tasks and provide a smoother user experience. Both processors have their own strengths, catering to different needs and preferences in the market.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 5 |
| Shaders | 64 | 80 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2020 May |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6875 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
2
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Unisoc SC9832E
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Apple A11 Bionic
7
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs Google Tensor G5
10
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S