HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors with their own unique specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features a total of 8 CPU cores, divided into 4 Cortex-A73 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.7 GHz. The architecture used is ARMv8-A, and the lithography is set at 12 nm. With 5500 million transistors, this processor has an efficiency of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 offers a different set of specifications. It has a total of 4 CPU cores, 4x Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and 4x Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz as well. The architecture used is ARMv8.2-A. Unlike the Kirin 710, the Dimensity 800 has a smaller lithography of 7 nm. It has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating a higher power consumption. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 also has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which the Kirin 710 lacks.
In terms of their specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 has more CPU cores (8 compared to 4) and a lower TDP (5 watts compared to 10 watts). However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a smaller lithography (7 nm compared to 12 nm) and includes a Neural Processing Unit for enhanced AI capabilities. These differences highlight the varying strengths and focus of each processor.
Ultimately, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user. Whether it is power efficiency, performance, or AI capabilities, both processors offer unique features that can cater to different needs.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features a total of 8 CPU cores, divided into 4 Cortex-A73 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.7 GHz. The architecture used is ARMv8-A, and the lithography is set at 12 nm. With 5500 million transistors, this processor has an efficiency of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 offers a different set of specifications. It has a total of 4 CPU cores, 4x Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and 4x Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz as well. The architecture used is ARMv8.2-A. Unlike the Kirin 710, the Dimensity 800 has a smaller lithography of 7 nm. It has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating a higher power consumption. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 also has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which the Kirin 710 lacks.
In terms of their specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 has more CPU cores (8 compared to 4) and a lower TDP (5 watts compared to 10 watts). However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a smaller lithography (7 nm compared to 12 nm) and includes a Neural Processing Unit for enhanced AI capabilities. These differences highlight the varying strengths and focus of each processor.
Ultimately, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user. Whether it is power efficiency, performance, or AI capabilities, both processors offer unique features that can cater to different needs.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6873, MT6873V |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
2
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G35
3
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G99
4
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs Apple A18 Pro
6
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Helio G80
8
Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
9
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
10
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855