HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and HiSilicon Kirin 950 are two processors that cater to different needs with their respective specifications. Let's compare the two based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, this processor boasts an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53. With a total of 8 cores, it provides a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. It packs an impressive 5500 million transistors and has a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53, similar to the Kirin 710. With 8 cores as well, it offers a similar balance between performance and energy efficiency. Like the Kirin 710, it operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set, but its lithography is slightly higher at 16 nm. The number of transistors in the Kirin 950 is 2000 million, which is significantly less compared to the Kirin 710. The TDP of the Kirin 950, however, remains the same at 5 Watts.
In terms of specifications, the Kirin 710 and Kirin 950 have some similarities in terms of CPU architecture and power consumption. However, the Kirin 710 excels in terms of lithography and the number of transistors, indicating better efficiency and potentially improved performance. The smaller lithography and higher number of transistors in the Kirin 710 suggest that it may be a more advanced and capable processor compared to the Kirin 950.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and HiSilicon Kirin 950 processors offer slightly different specifications. While both provide similar CPU architecture and power consumption, the Kirin 710 stands out with its smaller lithography and higher number of transistors, potentially leading to improved performance for devices powered by this processor.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, this processor boasts an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53. With a total of 8 cores, it provides a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. It packs an impressive 5500 million transistors and has a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53, similar to the Kirin 710. With 8 cores as well, it offers a similar balance between performance and energy efficiency. Like the Kirin 710, it operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set, but its lithography is slightly higher at 16 nm. The number of transistors in the Kirin 950 is 2000 million, which is significantly less compared to the Kirin 710. The TDP of the Kirin 950, however, remains the same at 5 Watts.
In terms of specifications, the Kirin 710 and Kirin 950 have some similarities in terms of CPU architecture and power consumption. However, the Kirin 710 excels in terms of lithography and the number of transistors, indicating better efficiency and potentially improved performance. The smaller lithography and higher number of transistors in the Kirin 710 suggest that it may be a more advanced and capable processor compared to the Kirin 950.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and HiSilicon Kirin 950 processors offer slightly different specifications. While both provide similar CPU architecture and power consumption, the Kirin 710 stands out with its smaller lithography and higher number of transistors, potentially leading to improved performance for devices powered by this processor.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 2000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-T880 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2015 November |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3650 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
3
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
4
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Google Tensor G3
5
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
6
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Samsung Exynos 7420
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T618