HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G are two processors that cater to different segments of users. Let's compare their specifications to understand their differences.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it has an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor boasts 8 cores, providing decent multitasking capabilities. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a transistor count of 5500 million, the Kirin 710 offers a good balance of power efficiency and performance within its TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is a more powerful and cutting-edge processor. It features an architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With its ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor is optimized for high-performance tasks. The Kirin 9000 5G operates at a lithography of 5 nm and boasts an impressive transistor count of 15300 million. Despite being more powerful, it has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts.
In addition to increased performance, the Kirin 9000 5G also excels in neural processing. It incorporates Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) neural processing units, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These enhancements enable the processor to handle artificial intelligence tasks efficiently.
Overall, while both processors offer decent performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G outshines the Kirin 710 in terms of raw power and efficiency. It features a more advanced architecture, a smaller lithography, a higher transistor count, and specialized neural processing capabilities. However, it's important to note that the Kirin 9000 5G is targeted at high-end devices, while the Kirin 710 caters to mid-range smartphones.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it has an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor boasts 8 cores, providing decent multitasking capabilities. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a transistor count of 5500 million, the Kirin 710 offers a good balance of power efficiency and performance within its TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is a more powerful and cutting-edge processor. It features an architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With its ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor is optimized for high-performance tasks. The Kirin 9000 5G operates at a lithography of 5 nm and boasts an impressive transistor count of 15300 million. Despite being more powerful, it has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts.
In addition to increased performance, the Kirin 9000 5G also excels in neural processing. It incorporates Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) neural processing units, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These enhancements enable the processor to handle artificial intelligence tasks efficiently.
Overall, while both processors offer decent performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G outshines the Kirin 710 in terms of raw power and efficiency. It features a more advanced architecture, a smaller lithography, a higher transistor count, and specialized neural processing capabilities. However, it's important to note that the Kirin 9000 5G is targeted at high-end devices, while the Kirin 710 caters to mid-range smartphones.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 15300 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G78 MP24 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 760 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 24 |
Shaders | 64 | 384 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2020 October |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 7870
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio P90
3
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Unisoc SC9832E
4
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Samsung Exynos 8895
5
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
6
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
8
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
10
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Samsung Exynos 850